• deur@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yes… let’s reschedule a public hearing because one person had a conflict? Maybe we could just adapt to people having lives and working?

    • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      One person was in their car tele conferencing from FUCKING TRAFFIC you stripped and rounded nut.

    • HeadfullofSoup@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      When you are driving your attention should be on the road not on the phone while a hearing about bike lane is going on

      which is kind of funny wanting to remove a bike lane that help protect cyclist while driving dangerously

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        So can’t talk to passengers either then? It’s hands free once it’s setup, there’s nothing inherently wrong with what’s being done actually.

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Ah yes, the classic “these things share one property so they share all properties” argument.

          Blinking closes your eyes. You can safely drive and blink. Thus, you can drive safely with your eyes closed.

          • lad@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Wow, that’s a good one, I should remember to try next time I drive

            But yeah, I ride a bicycle, so what do I know about safety anyway. So touching when people remove bike lanes to improve traffic, because they care <3

    • Evkob (they/them)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Being on a video call while operating a motor vehicle is dangerous and should be illegal in any sane jurisdiction under distracted driving laws.

      • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        As long as it’s setup, how’s it different than talking to a passenger? It’s completely hands free at that point.

        • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Considering the frame they caught him in he’s not looking at the road. Is it eyes free?

          • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            So can’t shoulder check or look at your passengers? Can’t adjust volume or other settings on your dash?Wrong thing to complain about lol. There’s hundreds of things that take your attention away from the road for a second or two that’s normally done while operating a vehicle already.