• Null User Object@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    threatens to “financially ruin” the entire AI industry

    No. Just the LLM industry and AI slop image and video generation industries. All of the legitimate uses of AI (drug discovery, finding solar panel improvements, self driving vehicles, etc) are all completely immune from this lawsuit, because they’re not dependent on stealing other people’s work.

    • A Wild Mimic appears!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      But it would also mean that the Internet Archive is illegal, even tho they don’t profit, but if scraping the internet is a copyright violation, then they are as guilty as Anthropic.

      • magikmw@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        IA doesn’t make any money off the content. Not that LLM companies do, but that’s what they’d want.

              • _stranger_@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                They could move to a voluntary model in the worst case, they don’t profit from it. Institute a “robots.txt” style protocol for signalling opt-in intent to volunteer for scraping by the archive.

                  • _stranger_@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    I would imagine someone would still need to actually sue the Internet Archive for this to be a problem for them. The vast majority probably won’t care, and they’ll likely just have to deal with whatever the equivalent of a DMCA takedown notice is for them.