• Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Firefox really does seem to have lost the plot… they don’t seem to go five minutes without slamming their dick in another drawer. It starts to look like they’re in to it.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I never trusted them. Who would ever set up a nonprofit owned by a for profit company if not to decieve people?

      I do appreciate the Open Sourced GECKO engine, though. I like Waterfox.

      • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        a nonprofit owned by a for profit company

        It’s the other way around, the foundation owns the corporation.

        Still feels like the corporation is the one making decisions though.

        • krunklom@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          i think they may be referencing the fact that huge amounts of money have been given to them by google?

  • 58008@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Literally no one on this green earth asked for this shit. In fact, we’ve been pretty direct about how much we don’t want it.

    It’s exhausting.

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well, stupid people want it and they do use it when its shoved in their face. Like how samsung updated and BLATANTLY made their peice of shit AI button TAKE OVER THR POWER BUTTON so when you try to turn off your phone little old granny gets confused that an ai agent pops up and starts recording you. Absolutely infuriating and I wish torture on whoever implemented that shit.

        • Univ3rse@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          Bixby was not llm based, originally, and sometimes updates will rewrite a user’s custom settings. For instance, I had a galaxy on which I made pushing the power button three times turn on the flashlight. An update occurred that overrode that setting by deleting it and turned on five presses to call 911. I ended up accidently calling 911 at 3am (accompanied by a blasting alarm sound) trying not to wake someone by turning on the light.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Bixby was not llm based

            I’m not really sure how that really makes any difference though. I’m not defending their decision I’m just saying that it’s been around for a while now.

            I’ve just pressed my power button five times and it does call, what I’m assuming is, emergency number. It’s the wrong one for my country (genius Samsung) so God knows what that would actually do, but it doesn’t auto call I have to actually press the call button. Maybe they received some user feedback?

            Seems a bit pointless given the fact that I have to press the button five times to call the emergency services but their phone number is only three digits long.

            • Univ3rse@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              That’s goofy as hell that the emergency number isn’t localized. I think the idea that pressing a physical button 5 times quickly is faster than having to look at the phone and select options. Idk, though, I don’t use it.

      • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        The kinds of people who want that switched to Google Chrome years ago. Only people who care more about software freedom than convenience are still using Firefox today.

      • btaf45@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Like how samsung updated and BLATANTLY made their peice of shit AI button TAKE OVER THR POWER BUTTON

        Was that part of OneUI 7? I’m so glad I never installed that downgrade.

      • somethingsomethingidk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Holy shit I had no idea until I read your comment. I thought “surely they will have respected all of my opt outs”. I guess this is my last samsung phone lol

    • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Mozilla has stopped working on developing and improving their products, and is now entirely focused on adding trendy terms and garbage, to feed money to their C*Os.

      • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        They in the last year or so added built in vertical tabs , much better hardware support for decoding video on Linux, continue to support manifest v2 and high quality ad blocking. Have increased performance and memory usage.

        In the last 7 years performance is night and day different as is multiple process performance and switched away from unmaintainable old broken addon system.

        They also created one of the premiere programming languages which is making in roads in the Linux kernel.

  • Tywèle [she|her]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Do you have to enable the feature first? Because I’m on v141 and I don’t see this feature. Complaining about a useless and draining feature that you yourself enabled is a special kind of stupid tbh.

    • Semicolon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      There is none, this is all AI=bad knee-jerk reaction. From what I can tell, so far Firefox has 3 ML-based systems implemented:

      • Site / text translation - fully local, small model, requires manual action from user
      • Tab grouping suggestions - fully local, small model, requires manual action from user
      • Image alt text generation (when adding images to a PDF) - fully local, small model, looks like it’s enabled by default but can be turned off directly in the modal that appears when adding alt text

      All of these models are small enough to be quickly run locally on mobile devices with minimal wait time. The CPU spikes appear to be a bug in the inference module implementation - not an intended behavior.

      Firefox also provides UI for connecting to cloud-based chatbots on a sidebar, but they need to be manually enabled to be used. The sidebar is also customizable so anyone who doesn’t want this button there can just remove it. There’s also a setting in about:config that removes it harder.

      I actually really like the way Mozilla is introducing these features. I recently had to visit another country’s post office site and having the ability to just instantly translate it directly on my device is great.

  • Mika@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    TBH despite I don’t like this specific idea, nor use Firefox directly, I do like the usage of local inference vs sending your data to thirdparty to do AI.

    They just needed to do it OPT IN, not OPT OUT.

        • Zombie-Mantis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          A lot of people would rather sit around and tear down the progress being made around them for being imperfect, than pitch in to help change things for the better.

          • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            What is the gain? What is a single gain you think they have milked from their users?

              • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                But nobody pays for Firefox? Do you mean the “recommended pages”? Because yeah that is a revenue source I guess, but as long as I can turn it off I can let it slide

                • piefood@feddit.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  They get money from Google, advertisements, and selling data. Did you think Mozilla made it without paying their employees and executives?

  • nectar45@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Firefox is a good example of “either you die a hero or live long enoigh to see yourself become the villian”

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s also an example of a smaller company trying fight a mega Corp with infinite money, gained via unethical means.

      People are shitting on Firefox while ignoring what they are up against.

      I have no solution for their funding issue, what are they supposed to do? Charge for the browser or ads? There’s literally no other alternative and I don’t know what the solution is.

      What I do know is that once FF dies and chrome fully owns the web we are well and truly fucked.

      Honesty it might already be too late.

      • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I could not disagree more.

        Mozilla has used the most powerful cheat code in history: infinite money for free.

        Google cannot let Mozilla go under or they would become an actual monopolist, triggering a lot of laws that would force them to diversifying/selling the browser.

        They don’t want any of that headache so they’re pumping Mozilla full of money, making sure that they can always operate as “the other browser engine”.

        The issue is that Mozilla’s management seems to be completely incapable of doing anything interesting. Instead of ensuring that Firefox is the lightest, most optimised browser on the market while also being packed full of features (or at least full-fledged add-ons, not this crap they have), they do… mostly nothing.

        Their last major update was “vertical tabs”, something that Chromium-based browsers had for around a decade.

        Their previous major update was integrating Pocket…

        Meanwhile, PWAs still barely work, add-ons are still dependent on the website being loaded instead of working on the browser level, the whole thing still feels bulky.

        Mozilla management needs to be replaced and then we might see some movement on the market.

        • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          You’re forgetting the fact that laws are currently only being triggered if said company slanders dear leader.

          If Google kisses ass you best believe they would completely allow them to be a monopoly and would ignore any laws being violated

          • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Hinging their entire future on the bet that their country gets an easily manipulated dictator, when said dictator is 80 years old already, would be extremely short-sighted from Google.

            • xspurnx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              Mark my words: It will be Vance, not Trump who gets to be the first King of America.

              The future is bleak.

              • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                I don’t know if Vance has a strong enough following. Trump is effectively worshipped by MAGAts, not sure Vance is capable of taking over like that.

        • Jännät@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Are we pretending that lots and lots of people aren’t incredibly horny for AI right now?

          • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Actual users hate AI. Shareholders love it. It’s a bubble and the business world is trying to force it everywhere they can to create a dependency.

            • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Correction: power users, such as the type on Lemmy, trend towards hating ai. That is by no means “all users” by any stretch of the term.

              • aesthelete@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                Nah, they’ve done studies and most people find it fucking annoying, worse, and don’t want to pay any extra for it.

                The whole thing is an obvious supply side economics push.

                • amorpheus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 days ago

                  It’s really annoying when it’s pushed in our faces everywhere. For getting a quick image of something you specify, or help with some boilerplate text it can be pretty neat.

              • Jännät@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                Exactly.

                People seem to think “if I don’t do X, that means nobody does X”

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    The pathological need to find something to use LLMs for is so bizzare.

    It’s like the opposite of classic ML, relatively tiny special purpose models trained for something critical, out of desperation, because it just can’t be done well conventionally.

    But this:

    AI-enhanced tab groups. Powered by a local AI model, these groups identify related tabs and suggest names for them. There is even a “Suggest more tabs for group” button that users can click to get recommendations.

    Take out the word AI.

    Enhanced tab groups. Powered by a local algorithm, these groups identify related tabs and suggest names for them. There is even a “Suggest more tabs for group” button that users can click to get recommendations.

    If this feature took, say, a gigabyte of RAM and a bunch of CPU, it would be laughed out. But somehow it ships because it has the word AI in it? That makes no sense.

    I am a massive local LLM advocate. I like “generative” ML, within reason and ethics. But this is just stupid.

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      even without AI, to me tab groups are already feature creep bloat in browsers. do people really put that much effort into organizing tabs?

      • exu@feditown.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I like the tab groups. I use them often at work to group an issue with related tabs and my attempts at solving it. Also makes it easier to pause work on one problem and work on something else because I have the tabs grouper and know exactly where to go back.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          I like the tab groups.

          And nobody should stop you installing an extension that provides tab groups. I agree with the other commentator that some features can be left to extensions and don’t need to be part of the core web browser, though.

          • frongt@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            True, but I’m not sure that an extension would have the necessary access to manipulate the browser like that. I don’t think it should. A malicious extension could do horrible things.

            • woelkchen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              I’m not sure that an extension would have the necessary access to manipulate the browser like that.

              I don’t know if they still do but they used to have. That, however, is something to discuss with the genius decision makers at Mozilla who decide to break extension APIs every couple of years. Firefox on Android still hasn’t recovered from last time.

    • Godort@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      The pathological need to find something to use LLMs for is so bizzare.

      Venture capital dumped so much money into the tech without understanding the full scope of what it was capable of. Now they’re so in so deep that they desperately NEED to find something profitable it can do, otherwise they’ll lose the farm.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Firefox has little financial motivation for this, though?

        Other than getting “AI” investor money, if that’s the plan… But otherwise it just feels like they’re following a meme.

        • A Wild Mimic appears!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          90% of their cash flow comes from google to be the default search engine - they are probably trying to open up alternative routes of funding to reduce the risk, since it’s not guaranteed that the money will keep coming due to the current lawsuit.

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Right, I sympathize with that.

            …But also it’s ridiculous. Like why should including a feature with “AI” in it get them VC money? Even if that’s kinda reality?

            TBH they should just become a contributor to llama.cpp and market that somehow.

    • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      When I’m browsing around with multiple tabs open, the last thing I want is something to start moving them around and messing my flow up. This is a solution looking for a problem.

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Yup

        Auto naming functionality is neat in some cases, like the AI chat UI itself

        • It’s convenient to have names when toggling between a few recent chats or searching through 10s or 100s of chats later on
        • I spawn new chats often and it’s tedious to name them all
        • I don’t have a strong preference for what the title is as long as it’s clear what the chat was about

        Tab groups don’t hit those points at all

        • I’ll have a handful of tab groups
        • I don’t make them often
        • I have a strong preference for what it’s called, and the AI will have trouble figuring out exactly what I’m using those sites for