Young people should be able to access information, speak to each other and to the world, play games, and express themselves online without the government making decisions about what speech is permissible. But in one of the latest misguided attempts to protect children online, internet users of all...
  • SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1·
    6 days ago

    Well, they don’t care, because this is a good reason to start total control. Or they just want to raise a submissive generation of obedient dogs who don’t know what it means to fight back or bite or think critically. China by the way is a great example of the alpha version of the shit that can await us.

  • rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    1·
    7 days ago

    You mean sharing their real identity with online companies who will sell and/or lose it to hackers doesn’t make children sAfE oNLinE??!!?!11?!

  • int32@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    0·
    6 days ago

    failure to comply could result in fines of up to 10% of global revenue or courts blocking services

    So most federated platforms should be fine, as they don’t have any revenue(usually) and blocking is hard because DNS is easy to bypass and there just are so many instances already.